Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sabrina haake's avatar

Thank you, but I say sue the bastards. Fox and Musk have gotten away with spreading disinformation because of a misunderstanding of the political speech doctrine: The First Amendment protects ‘core political speech’ above all other forms of expression. But Musk purchasing the world’s town square only to weaponize it to support his own agenda, and Fox admittedly lying to viewers nonstop to promote Trump, isn’t political speech presumptively entitled to legal protection.

Weaponized disinformation will ultimately kill the First Amendment, which the Supreme Court recognized back in 1969 when it approved the Fairness Doctrine and required accuracy in the media. Even in politics, the foundational role of protecting free speech is the promotion of free ideas, not to protect a nefarious publisher’s monopoly.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

There's much to be said for the ice cream vs broccoli analogy but, in my opinion, it misses an important aspect. It's not really ice cream they're being served; ice cream is sweet. It's a steady diet of hate cream and fear cream. Negative emotions are much more engaging and motivating than positive emotions online and in other media. Add to that the fact that internet trolls have said in the past that they've tried to spread falsehoods among liberals, and they simply aren't as likely to take the bait as conservatives. So, we have a third to half (if the non-voters follow the distribution of voters) who are especially susceptible to the kinds of disinformation that gets them worked up and ready to take action. It will be much harder to confront that without, perhaps, turning into them, at least as a public facing rhetorical device. I don't know that we would want to do that. But otherwise, we just have to wait for the planned economic policy to tank the economy, in which case we'll do well with the voters next time, only to have the cycle repeat 4 or 8 years later.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts