Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sabrina haake's avatar

Excellent summation. There are several moving parts to the GOP's plan to subvert the outcome in November and I'm pretty sure you hit most of them. One thing I'd add is that the SAVE Act, Mike Johnson's move to reduce voting among blue populations, would disproportionately hurt women. 90% of married women take their husbands' names, and many do not have original source documents (like certified birth certificates) to "prove" they are US citizens. Their votes would be thrown out if republicans get their way, and the fight aint over yet. It's a chilling attempt, and more pundits need to discuss it.

Expand full comment
hillary lewis's avatar

Thank you!!! I cancelled my 25+ year digital NYTimes subscription after I read Stephens's op-ed last week. I couldn't stand it any longer how urban media blasts out its "balanced" drivvel which goes straight to right-wing airwaves and into the crucial swing states. Bill Maher and Stephanie Ruhle called Stephens out Friday night but it wasn't enough. Bret Stephens is decisive enough to enjoy his Blue City lifestyle but he can't decide between Kamala and Trump? He's a jackass as is the Times editor who hired him. When they fire him AND if Kamala wins, I will resubscribe--but am "undecided" on that. PS: I lived in New York City for years and now in rural Ohio on the ground. The urban media needs to listen to itself.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts